Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Bragg et al vs. Deforge et al

Public Record

Milford/Ansonia Small Claims Court, Connecticut
Docket # SCC-301575
Filed 1/5/10

The plaintiffs state that Donald H. Deforge did not properly disclose that the vital pulp surgery he performed on their dog was not a permanent fix. They state they were never informed that the restoration to the tooth could become dislodged. Three weeks after surgery the restoration became dislodged. The plaintiffs state that Donald Deforge sent them an estimate via email to the surgery and this email never stated that this was not a permanent fix. Plaintiffs paid $1,200 for surgery resulting in a temporary fix to a problem. Plaintiffs were counter-sued by Deforge and deny all of his claims.